Subject	Here's something to think about:
Posted by	Marshall on November 29, 2004 at 10:44 AM
	This message has been viewed 97 times.
In Reply To	Zemulator vs BrandX Standalone Debate posted by BOOZTD 3 on November 28, 2004 at 11:20 PM
Message	:The haltech has a resolution of ~0.008ms. So it can react with in 0.008ms. Now a stock ECU i believe usually around ~0.4ms which is TONS slower. If those numbers are accurate (and I don't think they are), let's do some math. Take an engine running at 10,000 rpm. 10,000 / 60 = 166.666 revolutions per second. 1 second / 166.666 = each revolution takes .006 seconds, or 6 milliseconds. That value is 15 times slower than the .4 millisecond resolution you said the stock ECU has. Considering that not every cylinder fires during each revolution, only so many adjustments can be made in a given amount of time. I don't think the stock ECU has much of a problem keeping up with the engine. So if your numbers are correct, any of the engine management systems will be waiting on the engine.
Follow Ups	Zemulator vs BrandX Standalone Debate - BOOZTD 3 23:20:13 11/28/04 The reason i stay with stock ECU's on my Z's and honda's - sweet z (UTAH) 23:37:09 11/28/04 I'll agree - BOOZTD 3 23:43:53 11/28/04 VTC Control is nice... - xybertron 23:55:38 11/28/04 Most stand alones use speed density, so the response - AzHeat 01:37:24 11/29/04 MAP would be nice... - xybertron 01:59:50 11/29/04 Map would be the best conversion for the VG motor because - AzHeat 08:26:16 11/29/04 Re: MAP would be nice... - sparkie 11:38:00 11/29/04 sure you will.. (n/m) - SniPer SR71 (Dallas) 16:06:05 11/29/04 isnt it mechanically op, not electrically operated? (n/m) - BooZted 08:01:14 11/29/04 uses a solenoid to mechanicaly operate an oil valve - AzHeat 08:22:54 11/29/04 Best argument I have seen - 16x16 resolution map - maglito 00:08:37 11/29/04 My $.02 - Ash's Z 01:56:03 11/29/04 Thanks for the read, my mind is already made up.... - BOOZTD 3 04:47:56 11/29/04 Why do you need to convince your friends? - Marshall 10:24:28 11/29/04 Both of these points i know - BOOZTD 3 17:27:31 11/29/04 LOL - Ash's Z 18:52:24 11/29/04 That was a good post Sir. (n/m) - RSR 06:47:46 11/29/04 Re: My $.02 - genic 08:46:15 11/29/04 I play the drums. :) (n/m) - Ash's Z 10:58:10 11/29/04 awesome! did you know jerry plays them as well? - genic 11:19:28 11/29/04 I've been to Georgia, I know "The Springer Effect", LOL. - Ash's Z 12:31:00 11/29/04 I play the drums. :) (n/m) - Ash's Z 12:12:26 11/29/04 two drums? (n/m) - SactoTodd 12:25:15 11/29/04 Why would speed density be less accurate than MAS? - AzHeat 11:08:11 11/29/04 It is my understanding that the temperature sensor in a - Ash's Z 12:26:38 11/29/04 Re: It is my understanding that the temperature sensor in a - sparkie 15:45:32 11/29/04 about speed density - sparkie 11:32:22 11/29/04 Here's something to think about: - Marshall 10:44:52 11/29/04 You are forgetting timing resolution - kuah@splparts.com 11:59:53 11/29/04 I'm not forgetting that. - Marshall 14:58:42 11/29/04 Re: I'm not forgetting that. - sparkie 15:34:29 11/29/04 You are way off. The ECU consists of two processors - Ash's Z 15:39:13 11/29/04 How am I way off? Did you even read my post? - Marshall 16:43:11 11/29/04 I did. Why are you getting so defensive? I only said you - Ash's Z 18:36:53 11/29/04 You are way off. The ECU consists of two processors - Ash's Z 18:35:05 11/29/04 I'm way off again? (n/m) - Marshall 20:39:48 11/29/04 Re: I'm not forgetting that. - kuah@splparts.com 18:36:20 11/29/04 If one has the need to tune down to a tenth of a degree - Ash's Z 18:44:19 11/29/04 Re: If one has the need to tune down to a tenth of a degree - kuah@splparts.com 19:24:16 11/29/04 Re: Re: If one has the need to tune down to a tenth of a degree - Marshall 22:17:41 11/29/04 yeah, I think you're right. (n/m) - Marshall 20:41:09 11/29/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.